Sebanyak 4 item atau buku ditemukan
A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical Theology
Pro Ecclesia is a quarterly journal of theology published by the Center for Catholic and Evangelical Theology.
In his monograph on Gregory of Nazianzus, Christopher Beeley is no exception.
Yet when Beeley claims that Gregory is the preeminent ... After a helpful
introduction that narrates Gregory's life and the doctrinal controversies from 350
to 390, Beeley discusses his views on the nature of theology (chapter 1),
Christology (chapter 2), Pneumatology (chapter 3), the Trinity (chapter 4), and
lastly the nature of Christian ministry (chapter 5). The essence of Christian piety,
for Gregory, ...
A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical Theology
Pro Ecclesia is a quarterly journal of theology published by the Center for Catholic and Evangelical Theology.
HOW TO READ JAMES KUGEL: JEWS, CATHOLICS, AND THE BIBLE AFTER
SKEPTICISM Edward T. Oakes, S.J. No one disputes that historical criticism of
the Bible represents a challenge for the systematic theologian, indeed for
believers generally.1 If that fact were not already well established, one need only
read the works of the renowned scholar of the Hebrew Bible, James Kugel,
especially his latest book, How to Read the Bible.2 In this article I wish to address
that chalEdward ...
A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical Theology
Pro Ecclesia is a quarterly journal of theology published by the Center for Catholic and Evangelical Theology.
Thomas Joseph White, O.P., “Classical Christology after Schleiermacher and
Barth: A Thomist Perspective,” Pro Ecclesia 20, no. 3 (2011): 229–63. White's
arguments in this essay stand in line with the argument of his helpful and
enriching book, Wisdom in the Face of Mo- dernity: A Study in Thomistic Natural
Theology (Ave Maria, FL: Sapentia Press 2009). 2. White makes related claims
about Friedrich Schleiermacher's theology, but since his primary interest seems
to be Barth—and ...
A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical Theology
Pro Ecclesia is a quarterly journal of theology published by the Center for Catholic and Evangelical Theology.
Once I had that image of Barth's doctrine of God in mind, I could no longer read II.
2 or Barth the same. Where before I had seen a “duck,” now I primarily saw a “
rabbit,” even when I wanted to see the duck. This essay attempts to regain the
vision of the “duck.” nominalism present in the Reformed tradition by absorbing
the doctrine. 1. THE “DUCK” VERSUS “RABBIT” VISIONS OF BARTH'S
DOCTRINE OF GOD Hans urs von Balthasar was responsible for my original
vision of Barth's work ...
